Where’s the evidence?

A key question to ask before discussing potential impacts of human activity upon Arctic ecosystems is:

How do we know that the recent warming trend in the Arctic is unusual when compared to long-term natural cycles?

As instrumental records are limited both in spatial and temporal extent (earliest records go back only a couple of centuries) they are not adequate to answer this question. The answer comes in the form of palaeo-records; naturally stored records of past environmental conditions. Before I plunge into reviewing scientific papers, I thought it would be a good idea to review some key concepts which we can refer back to later in the blog. As we'll see, the answer to 'where's the evidence?' is: everywhere!

I’ve heard about ice cores and seen the hockey stick diagram, is this what you’re talking about?

In part, yes! Ice cores contain a number of proxies (indicators) of past conditions around the Arctic, and contribute to understanding of global interactions. Most key ice-core records from the Arctic are from Greenland including GISP/Grip and NGRIP. A common proxy used from ice-cores is the δ¹⁸O:δ¹⁶O ratio, a comparison between two stable forms of oxygen isotope found bonded with hydrogen in the water molecules (H₂O, I’m trying not to insult your intelligence!).

As δ¹⁸O is two protons heavier than δ¹⁶O, it requires more energy to evaporate and condensates more readily. Therefore, by measuring this ratio in ice cores, it is possible to reconstruct past temperatures as well as a history of moisture transport. Cold temperatures generally are indicated by a lower concentration of the heavier isotope δ¹⁸O. Oxygen isotope records are also found in other proxies including in tree-rings and in the chemical composition of marine organism shells. Other proxies included in ice cores are deuterium ratios (heavy hydrogen), greenhouse gas concentrations (care is required due to a certain amount of gas exchange) as well as many others.

So, that’s it?

Fortunately (or I suppose unfortunately depending on your viewpoint) not, there’s a couple more key records used to reconstruct Arctic environments which will crop up a lot in this blog, proxies found in lake sediments and marine records as well as tree rings.

How can lake sediments show past environment?

Common to most palaeo-records is a build-up of material over time, as happens with lake sediments. All manner of organisms and materials build up with this sediment, and these themselves are the proxies. A common proxy is diatom frustules, siliceous shells of microscopic algae of which there are thousands of species. These all respond to different conditions favourably, so by recording the species community composition, it is possible to reconstruct the past conditions qualitatively (descriptively) or quantitatively (through the use of transfer functions). Diatoms can be identified relatively easily under a light microscope, if you know what you’re doing that is (as a side point, if you don’t, as I’ve experienced, the number of species can be quite overwhelming).

Other proxies include chironomidae (non-biting midge species), fossil pollen and marine ostracod records (bivalve crustaceans). Also, a recently developed but useful record is SCP (spheroidal carbonaceous particles) which are produced from burning. They indicate atmospheric contamination when found in lake sediments.

From these records and knowledge of the conditions individual species prefer today, it is possible to reconstruct many aspects of the environment including temperatures, pH, Total Phosporous (TP) and ice cover as well as many others.

What about tree rings?

Everyone knows you can count tree rings to find the age of a tree, as they build up in layers over time. Due to this quality of a ring layer growing during one year, tree-ring proxies have the useful feature of being annually resolved; having an environmental record for each individual year. The longest complete records extend past 10,000 years before 1950 (10Kyr BP) include fossilised tree remains, giving an almost complete record of the Holocene (they also allow the calibration of radiocarbon dates to calendar years as described here). Analysis of tree rings is called ‘dendrochronology’.

Fossilised tree records contain much information, including the dating of extreme events as well as climate records. Trees destroyed due to an earthquake, for example, can show the exact date of that event if patterns are widespread. Climatic information is revealed by the widths of tree rings themselves; narrow rings indicate drought or cold years. If these patterns are seen across a wide area, a regional climatic pattern may be inferred to a very high resolution.

Thanks! You’ve made everything absolutely clear and I have no further questions.

Great! (If, as is more likely, you have any issues with this post, please comment).

It's important to make the point at this stage that reconstructions from palaeo-records are not perfect and do not always agree. Natural systems are complicated and are not always fully understood, and the patterns observable today may not have always worked in the same way throughout all glacial-interglacial cycles. Therefore, assumptions are stretched for very old reconstructions. Multi-proxy studies are desirable and when possible will be preferentially referred to in this blog.

The next post will consider some key papers which have used these proxies, focussing on this article.

______

For a much better and thorough summary of all of these proxies see the book ‘Global Change in the Holocene’ by Mackay et al eds. (2005) published by Hodder Arnold 528pp.